Get WAE ready: the score split, the Cabrillo layouts and the QTC list

The score summary now splits the way N1MM's does. `ContestLog` keeps a tally
per band, and per kind of row where the contest has kinds, and the score window
reads those instead of adding the rows up itself. Three things were wrong with
the old sum:

- The band rows counted a multiplier as one whatever the band. WAE weights it
  by band — `ScoreRow.AddContact` adds four on 3.5, three on 7 and two on 14,
  21 and 28 — so the band rows did not add up to the total.
- The band rows counted contacts left out of the claimed score.
- There was no split by kind. `CWAE.LogInfo` and `ScoreClass.Description` give
  WAE a `Q/QTC` column and a row per band and kind, so contacts, traffic sent
  and traffic received are read apart.

The Cabrillo writer now pads the record name to seven characters, which is what
`ConvertCabrilloStructStdToString` does and why: `X-QSO:` is six characters and
a space, so every record name puts the frequency in the same column. Nonemm
wrote five, and the `X-QSO:` lines added last commit did not line up with the
rest.

WAE's own layouts follow `CWAE.CabrilloString`: three spaces after the sent
serial rather than the one every other column gets, and the transmitter column
only for a multi-operator entry.

`QtcTraffic.ToSend` no longer offers a contact marked as a dupe, which is what
`DBSupport.QTCRecordsetCount` leaves out with `Trim(ContactType) = ''`.

Checked by running the program against a WAE SSB log of six contacts and a
series of ten received: the band rows read 4, 3, 2 and 2 and add up to the 11
in the total row.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015NZkFxHde1iifAQemFTHxf
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-09 20:25:45 +00:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent de8edafa0c
commit d4d0375f1f
11 changed files with 181 additions and 37 deletions
+21
View File
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ public sealed class ContestLog
private readonly List<Qso> qsos = [];
private readonly Dictionary<string, DateTime> workedKeys = new(StringComparer.Ordinal);
private readonly HashSet<string> claimedMultipliers = new(StringComparer.Ordinal);
private readonly Dictionary<ScoreKey, ScoreTally> rows = [];
private ScoreTally tally = new();
public ContestLog(
@@ -42,6 +43,11 @@ public sealed class ContestLog
public ScoreTally Tally => tally;
/// The same score split the way N1MM's score window splits it: a row per
/// band, and per kind of row as well where the contest has kinds. The
/// rows add up to `Tally`.
public IReadOnlyDictionary<ScoreKey, ScoreTally> Rows => rows;
public int TotalScore => contest.TotalScore(tally, Entry);
/// What logging this contact right now would do, without logging it.
@@ -181,9 +187,11 @@ public sealed class ContestLog
return;
}
bool counts = qso.IsInScore;
ScoreTally row = RowFor(qso);
if (counts)
{
tally.AddQso(verdict.Points);
row.AddQso(verdict.Points);
}
if (!contest.IsContact(qso))
{
@@ -196,6 +204,7 @@ public sealed class ContestLog
if (counts)
{
tally.AddMultiplier(multiplier);
row.AddMultiplier(multiplier);
}
}
}
@@ -208,10 +217,22 @@ public sealed class ContestLog
/// Rescores the whole log. A removed or edited contact can hand its
/// multiplier to a later one, which only a full pass gets right.
private ScoreTally RowFor(Qso qso)
{
ScoreKey key = new(qso.Band?.Name ?? "", contest.RowKindFor(qso));
if (!rows.TryGetValue(key, out ScoreTally? row))
{
row = new ScoreTally();
rows[key] = row;
}
return row;
}
private void Rebuild()
{
workedKeys.Clear();
claimedMultipliers.Clear();
rows.Clear();
tally = new ScoreTally();
List<Qso> ordered = qsos.OrderBy(q => q.TimestampUtc).ToList();
qsos.Clear();