Three things were wrong with a contact the operator takes out of the claimed
score. The decompiled reference gives the rule in four places:
- `Contest.cs:437` returns zero points when `IsClaimedQso` is 0.
- `ContestInstance.cs:307` builds the where clause `CLAIMEDQSO = 1`, which the
dupe search (`DBSupport.cs:1189`) and the multiplier search
(`DBSupport.cs:1327`) both use, so an unclaimed contact takes nothing away
from a later one.
- The score query (`DBSupport.cs:1807`) adds `ContactType <> 'D'`, which the
other two do not. A contact marked as a dupe is therefore still searched for
dupes and multipliers, and is left out of the score alone.
- `Contact.cs:1563`, `3307` and `3881` write `X-QSO:` rather than dropping the
contact from the Cabrillo file.
`ContestLog` scored an unclaimed contact in full, and the Cabrillo writer left
it out of the file. `Qso.IsInScore` now holds the score rule and
`StatisticsPivot` uses it instead of its own copy.
The same reference also fixes the sent serial in three Cabrillo exporters.
ARRL 10M, Ukrainian DX and YO DX HF formatted the sent exchange from the
station rather than the contact, so a DX entrant exported `001` on every line.
N1MM reads the contact's own number: `CArrl10m.cs:122` writes it unpadded,
`CUkrainian.cs:232` and `CYOHFDX.cs:167` pad it to three digits.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015NZkFxHde1iifAQemFTHxf
`CabrilloString` names a field and a column width in turn. The line it makes
follows N1MM: the operator's callsign in the first 13 columns, then every
column padded to its width with one space after it, and a value longer than its
column cut rather than pushed sideways. The cut is new for every contest, not
just the user-defined ones — the columns are the sponsor's, not ours.
`CabrilloVersion` is read too, so a contest whose sponsor still asks for 2.0
gets it in the header.
A contest that lays out its own line can put the transmitter column where it
wants it, or leave it out, so the writer no longer adds one at the end.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RoGtneMQaz4M9w7Kk49AVD
Both are in the station's log and neither could be opened. The rules are
written from the published ones and checked by replaying the log.
YOTA scores a contact by the age the other operator sends: 13 points down to 10
for anyone 25 or under, whatever the continent, and 1 point or 3 for everyone
else. Every age worked on a band is a multiplier. The 2024, 2025 and 2026 logs
come out to the contact.
OK/OM DX is the first contest whose exchange differs by the other station's
country: a county from OK and OM stations, a serial number from everyone else,
in the two columns N1MM keeps them in, and `SkipsField` walks the entry window
past the box that does not apply. Points depend on which side the operator is
on, and Czechia and Slovakia count as the two countries they are. The 2023 log
comes out to the contact.
The Cabrillo exchange now gets the entry, because YOTA sends an age that only
the contest setup knows.
Two differences are left in the log, both from the .udc files the operator
used: their YOTA file only lists ages 7 to 25, so a younger operator scored as
an adult, and one OK/OM log was made with the file for stations outside OK and
OM while signing an OM call.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RoGtneMQaz4M9w7Kk49AVD
WAE is two contests in one. The QSOs are scored like any other, except that a
multiplier is worth four on 80 metres, three on 40 and two on the high bands, so
Multiplier grew a weight and ScoreTally sums weights rather than counting.
Europe works the rest of the world and the rest of the world works Europe; on
RTTY that rule is dropped and everybody works everybody.
The other half is QTC traffic: one station reads back contacts it has already
made, ten to a series, and every line is a point for both stations. Those lines
live in the log as rows of their own, exactly where N1MM puts them — Exchange1
says SQTC or RQTC, the reported contact's time, call and number go in the sent
report, received report and sent number columns, and the series in misc text.
So a log written by either program opens in the other with its traffic intact.
A QTC row is not a worked station: Contest.IsContact says so, and ContestLog
keeps such rows out of the dupe index and the multiplier index while still
counting their points. Cabrillo writes them as QTC: records.
Checked against eight real WAE logs rather than against my own reading of the
rules. Points agree with N1MM on all eight, to the contact. Weighted
multipliers agree on the six logs from 2022 on; the two older ones differ only
where the country file has since changed its mind, and in one place on purpose:
N1MM counts a callsign it cannot place as a multiplier with an empty value.
That comparison turned up two bugs of ours. A KG4 call is Guantanamo Bay only
when it is three or five characters long — KG4NE is, KG4IGC is an ordinary US
call — and the country file cannot say so, so every program that reads it
carries the rule. And Callsign is a record holding a list of modifiers, so the
generated equality compared that list by reference and two parses of one call
came out different.
Entering QTCs while operating is not there yet; the window is next.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ARRL DX, IARU HF, Sweepstakes, RTTY Roundup, NAQP and general logging join
CQ WW and CQ WPX. The Cabrillo QSO line is now built column by column by the
contest, because Sweepstakes puts the callsign after the serial number where
everyone else puts it first.
User-defined contests read the subset of N1MM's .udc settings that covers the
exchange, the dupe rule, points and up to three multipliers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Frequencies, bands, modes, callsigns, grid squares and the country file live in
Nonemm.Core. Nonemm.Contests holds the scoring engine and CQ WW and CQ WPX.
Nonemm.Storage writes N1MM's DXLOG schema, and Nonemm.Formats writes Cabrillo
3.0 and reads and writes ADIF.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
erikbrockoandClaude Opus 5
ErikandClaude Opus 5