Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
erikbrockoandClaude Opus 5 d4d0375f1f Get WAE ready: the score split, the Cabrillo layouts and the QTC list
The score summary now splits the way N1MM's does. `ContestLog` keeps a tally
per band, and per kind of row where the contest has kinds, and the score window
reads those instead of adding the rows up itself. Three things were wrong with
the old sum:

- The band rows counted a multiplier as one whatever the band. WAE weights it
  by band — `ScoreRow.AddContact` adds four on 3.5, three on 7 and two on 14,
  21 and 28 — so the band rows did not add up to the total.
- The band rows counted contacts left out of the claimed score.
- There was no split by kind. `CWAE.LogInfo` and `ScoreClass.Description` give
  WAE a `Q/QTC` column and a row per band and kind, so contacts, traffic sent
  and traffic received are read apart.

The Cabrillo writer now pads the record name to seven characters, which is what
`ConvertCabrilloStructStdToString` does and why: `X-QSO:` is six characters and
a space, so every record name puts the frequency in the same column. Nonemm
wrote five, and the `X-QSO:` lines added last commit did not line up with the
rest.

WAE's own layouts follow `CWAE.CabrilloString`: three spaces after the sent
serial rather than the one every other column gets, and the transmitter column
only for a multi-operator entry.

`QtcTraffic.ToSend` no longer offers a contact marked as a dupe, which is what
`DBSupport.QTCRecordsetCount` leaves out with `Trim(ContactType) = ''`.

Checked by running the program against a WAE SSB log of six contacts and a
series of ten received: the band rows read 4, 3, 2 and 2 and add up to the 11
in the total row.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015NZkFxHde1iifAQemFTHxf
2026-09-09 20:25:45 +00:00
erikbrockoandClaude Opus 5 bae40bb04e Show the boxes N1MM shows for each contest
The entry window had a fixed set of boxes with a Name and Comment box beside
the exchange. N1MM lays out one row of boxes per contest and nothing else, so
this does the same: general logging keeps Name and Comment, and a contest gets
the boxes it exchanges.

Two new members on `Contest` carry the cases where the boxes and the log
columns are not the same list:

- `FromExchange1` spreads what was typed in one box across the log columns.
  Where the other station sends a serial or a district code depending on where
  it is, N1MM gives it one box and sorts the value into the number, section or
  zone column from there, so the score and the Cabrillo file read it from the
  same column N1MM does.
- `LogFieldsFor` gives the log window its own column list. Sweepstakes takes
  the whole exchange in one box and logs it in four columns; `SweepstakesExchange`
  parses `72 A 74 SCV` in any order, reading from the last word back as N1MM
  does.

The sent serial is now marked as not required and space steps over it along
with the two report boxes, because nobody types the number going out.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015NZkFxHde1iifAQemFTHxf
2026-09-09 20:12:37 +00:00
erikbrockoandClaude Opus 5 3932f83147 Add the YOTA and OK/OM DX contests
Both are in the station's log and neither could be opened. The rules are
written from the published ones and checked by replaying the log.

YOTA scores a contact by the age the other operator sends: 13 points down to 10
for anyone 25 or under, whatever the continent, and 1 point or 3 for everyone
else. Every age worked on a band is a multiplier. The 2024, 2025 and 2026 logs
come out to the contact.

OK/OM DX is the first contest whose exchange differs by the other station's
country: a county from OK and OM stations, a serial number from everyone else,
in the two columns N1MM keeps them in, and `SkipsField` walks the entry window
past the box that does not apply. Points depend on which side the operator is
on, and Czechia and Slovakia count as the two countries they are. The 2023 log
comes out to the contact.

The Cabrillo exchange now gets the entry, because YOTA sends an age that only
the contest setup knows.

Two differences are left in the log, both from the .udc files the operator
used: their YOTA file only lists ages 7 to 25, so a younger operator scored as
an adult, and one OK/OM log was made with the file for stations outside OK and
OM while signing an OM call.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RoGtneMQaz4M9w7Kk49AVD
2026-08-31 09:16:44 +00:00
erikbrockoandClaude Opus 5 5c0ca558c1 Score the last three cases the way N1MM scores them
The three differences left after replaying the log were ours on purpose. A log
has to score the same in both programs, so they now follow N1MM:

- ARRL DX and CQ WW RTTY count the 14 Canadian areas N1MM lists as `48SDC14P`,
  which keeps Newfoundland apart from Labrador. A station sending the postal
  code is counted as the area the contest names.
- A maritime mobile is scored from the call it signs. CQ WW says it counts for
  the zone alone; N1MM gives it the country, and so do we.
- A callsign the country file cannot place counts as a multiplier with an empty
  value, so every unplaceable call worked on a band shares one multiplier.

29 of the 37 contest instances in the log now agree with N1MM on every contact
and on the totals. What is left is the country file of the day and rows whose
cached points N1MM never worked out again after a call was corrected.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RoGtneMQaz4M9w7Kk49AVD
2026-08-31 08:36:44 +00:00
erikbrockoandClaude Opus 5 04568d0ca3 Read the rest of what a .udc file says, and score what N1MM scores
Two pieces of work on the scoring engine.

The .udc reader now takes N1MM's published scoring vocabulary: the full
PointsPerContact condition set, the PointsMultBy family, PowerMult, BonusPoints,
the multiplier sources and the settings that say which stations bring a
multiplier in. MultMult is a weight rather than a switch, as in N1MM's
ComputeScore. The entry categories and the sent exchange reach the rules in a
new ContestEntry, so a contest can score by the power category it is entered in
or by what this station sends.

Then every contest in a real N1MM log was scored again from these rules and
compared with the points and multiplier flags N1MM wrote. That found five bugs:
ARRL DX and IARU read the exchange from the wrong column, a stored " " was read
as a value rather than as empty, CQ WW RTTY's own Canadian area names were not
counted, a maritime mobile scored nothing, and a contact in a mode the contest
does not run scored as if it were in the contest.

docs/n1mm-interop.md has the check and what still differs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RoGtneMQaz4M9w7Kk49AVD
2026-08-31 08:33:40 +00:00
erikbrockoandClaude Opus 5 9424c488ea Take the rest of what N1MM's QTC window does on CW
Reading the source again after this was tried turned up several things it had
wrong or left out.

The TU message went out only when reading a series out. N1MM sends it whichever
way the traffic went, and lets it name the series: {QTC} in it stands for the
header, so TU {QTC} 73 goes out as TU QTC 3/10 73.

The RX Ready button was hidden while sending and sent nothing on CW. It is
N1MM's QRV button: reading out it says R U QRV and keys QRV?, taking down it
says QRV and keys QRV.

The fields were asked for again with shift and Enter, which was made up. N1MM
uses the number keys, and writes them under the lines: 1, 2, 3 and 4 send the
time, call, serial or header of the last line again while reading out, and
shift with 1, 2 or 3 asks for that field while taking down.

The buttons now carry N1MM's names for the direction the traffic is going —
R U QRV, Snd Hdr, Snd1 to Snd10, Exit reading out; QRV, Hdr Agn, Agn1 to Agn10,
Exit taking down — and the Cfm column and Clear are hidden while reading out,
as N1MM hides them. The separate Send Hdr button is gone: N1MM has one button
there that sends the header one way and asks for it the other.

The log window gained N1MM's QTC? column for a contest that carries QTC
traffic. It holds the series, so a QTC row can be told from a contact; before
this a QTC row read as an ordinary one with odd values in the report columns.

Driven under Xvfb against a fake cwdaemon. Reading out: QRV?, QTC 3/2,
2319 DL7GGG 03, then 2319 and QTC 3/2 from the number keys, and
TU QTC 3/2 73 on Exit. Taking down: QRV, AGN TIME, AGN CALL.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RoGtneMQaz4M9w7Kk49AVD
2026-08-30 23:23:22 +00:00
erikbrockoandClaude Opus 5 8961677354 Score Worked All Europe, QTC traffic and all
WAE is two contests in one. The QSOs are scored like any other, except that a
multiplier is worth four on 80 metres, three on 40 and two on the high bands, so
Multiplier grew a weight and ScoreTally sums weights rather than counting.
Europe works the rest of the world and the rest of the world works Europe; on
RTTY that rule is dropped and everybody works everybody.

The other half is QTC traffic: one station reads back contacts it has already
made, ten to a series, and every line is a point for both stations. Those lines
live in the log as rows of their own, exactly where N1MM puts them — Exchange1
says SQTC or RQTC, the reported contact's time, call and number go in the sent
report, received report and sent number columns, and the series in misc text.
So a log written by either program opens in the other with its traffic intact.
A QTC row is not a worked station: Contest.IsContact says so, and ContestLog
keeps such rows out of the dupe index and the multiplier index while still
counting their points. Cabrillo writes them as QTC: records.

Checked against eight real WAE logs rather than against my own reading of the
rules. Points agree with N1MM on all eight, to the contact. Weighted
multipliers agree on the six logs from 2022 on; the two older ones differ only
where the country file has since changed its mind, and in one place on purpose:
N1MM counts a callsign it cannot place as a multiplier with an empty value.

That comparison turned up two bugs of ours. A KG4 call is Guantanamo Bay only
when it is three or five characters long — KG4NE is, KG4IGC is an ordinary US
call — and the country file cannot say so, so every program that reads it
carries the rule. And Callsign is a record holding a list of modifiers, so the
generated equality compared that list by reference and two parses of one call
came out different.

Entering QTCs while operating is not there yet; the window is next.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 23:48:47 +00:00